Approval Bottlenecks: Unblock Decisions and Hit Deadlines

Industries: Creator / Marketing / Design Agencies
Domains: Performance • Capacity • Finance • Contracts
Reading Time: 6 minutes


🚨 The Problem: Work Is Ready—Approvals Aren’t

Projects stall not because teams can’t deliver, but because decisions sit in inboxes. Drifting approvals trigger revision loops, missed launch windows, and write-offs. Senior creatives end up context-switching while juniors wait. Fixing approvals is mostly process and contract hygiene: clear owners, SLAs, decision standards, and a path when silence drags on.


🟒 Risk Conditions (Act Early)

Treat these as early signals that approvals will derail your schedule and margin:

  • Median approval latency > 48 hours on key milestones (concept, copy, design, final)

  • Multiple approvers or unclear RACI on a single deliverable

  • Revision rounds trending up (e.g., moving from 2 → 3+)

  • Senior utilization > 90% paired with idle junior capacity

  • “Waiting for client” time ≥ 10% of total hours this sprint

What to do now: name the approver(s), set an SLA, define acceptance criteria, and enable a fallback rule for silence.


πŸ”΄ Issue Conditions (Already in Trouble)

Move to containment if any apply:

  • Launch-critical milestone blocked > 3 business days

  • Overage hours > 15% vs estimate driven by late/serial feedback

  • Executive escalation or slipping campaign window

What to do now: freeze scope creep, compress decision paths, and put an executive decision cadence in place.


πŸ”Ž Common Diagnostics

Aim your fix with these quick checks:

  • Decision ownership: Is there a single accountable approver per milestone?

  • Acceptance criteria: Are “done” standards written (format, specs, brand rules, examples)?

  • Feedback quality: Are comments actionable (objective criteria) or opinion loops?

  • Approval ladder: Is there an expedite path for time-sensitive decisions?

  • Asset readiness: Are reference assets/brand kits centralized and current?

  • Contract hygiene: Do SOWs state approval SLAs and “silence = proceed” for low-risk steps?


πŸ›  Action Playbook

1) Make Decisions Flow (Risk Stage)

  • Name the approver per milestone (one accountable, many consulted)

  • Set approval SLAs (e.g., 48h concept/copy; 24h minor edits; 72h final legal)

  • Define acceptance criteria in the brief/SOW with examples & checklists

  • Create decision packets: single link with the file, context, success criteria, and due date

Expected impact: shorter decision cycles; fewer “back to the drawing board” moments.


2) Reduce Loops (Risk → Early Issue)

  • Batch feedback in standing review windows instead of trickle comments

  • Lock revision caps (e.g., 2 rounds) and convert extras to Change Requests (CRs)

  • Use structured feedback forms (must-keep / nice-to-have; objective reasons)

  • Shift work down: juniors execute; seniors provide direction + final QA

Expected impact: realization ↑ 5–10pp; on-time delivery ↑; senior burnout ↓.


3) Expedite When It’s Hot (Active Issue)

  • Executive decision cadence: 15-min daily stand-up until milestone unblocked

  • Fallback rule: “silence = proceed” on low-risk steps after SLA; for high-risk, escalate to sponsor

  • Scope freeze on the current milestone; new asks → CR with impact chart

  • Visible burn chart: show time lost vs remaining to sharpen choices

Expected impact: decisions land; scope creep contained; dates recovered.


4) Make It Stick (Post-Mortem)

  • Brief template upgrade: add acceptance criteria, asset checklist, approver names

  • SOW upgrades: approval SLAs, revision caps, CR triggers, expedite ladder

  • Governance rhythm: weekly milestone review; red/yellow items get sponsor attention

  • Library & systems: central brand kit, examples, and reusable components

Expected impact: predictable approvals, fewer loops, faster launches.


πŸ“œ Contract & Renewal Implications

  • Approval SLAs (by milestone type) and “silence = proceed” rules for low-risk steps

  • Revision caps with a fee schedule for extra rounds

  • CR path for scope additions or compressed timelines

  • Kill/cancellation fees and milestone acceptance language

  • Executive escalation clause for time-critical campaigns


πŸ“ˆ KPIs to Monitor

  • Median approval latency — target ≤ 48h (minor ≤ 24h; legal ≤ 72h)

  • Revisions per deliverable — target ≤ 2.0

  • On-time milestone rate — target ≥ 95%

  • Realization % — target ≥ 85–90%

  • Senior utilization — healthy 75–85%; avoid sustained > 90%


🧠 Why This Playbook Matters

Great creative needs great decisions. When approvals are owned, timed, and standards-based, teams move with confidence, juniors get to contribute, seniors steer—not scramble—and launches hit their date without torching margin.


βœ… Key Takeaways

  • One owner, clear clock: single approver + SLA per milestone.

  • Decide on standards: acceptance criteria end opinion loops.

  • Cap and convert: extra rounds become CRs.

  • Escalate fast: daily exec cadence for blocked launches.

  • Institutionalize: brief/SOW templates and a central brand kit keep flow.


➑️ Run This Playbook on Your Data with DigitalCore


Was this article helpful?
© 2025 Digital Core