Approval Bottlenecks: Unblock Decisions and Hit Deadlines
Industries: Creator / Marketing / Design Agencies
Domains: Performance • Capacity • Finance • Contracts
Reading Time: 6 minutes
π¨ The Problem: Work Is Ready—Approvals Aren’t
Projects stall not because teams can’t deliver, but because decisions sit in inboxes. Drifting approvals trigger revision loops, missed launch windows, and write-offs. Senior creatives end up context-switching while juniors wait. Fixing approvals is mostly process and contract hygiene: clear owners, SLAs, decision standards, and a path when silence drags on.
π’ Risk Conditions (Act Early)
Treat these as early signals that approvals will derail your schedule and margin:
-
Median approval latency > 48 hours on key milestones (concept, copy, design, final)
-
Multiple approvers or unclear RACI on a single deliverable
-
Revision rounds trending up (e.g., moving from 2 → 3+)
-
Senior utilization > 90% paired with idle junior capacity
-
“Waiting for client” time ≥ 10% of total hours this sprint
What to do now: name the approver(s), set an SLA, define acceptance criteria, and enable a fallback rule for silence.
π΄ Issue Conditions (Already in Trouble)
Move to containment if any apply:
-
Launch-critical milestone blocked > 3 business days
-
Overage hours > 15% vs estimate driven by late/serial feedback
-
Executive escalation or slipping campaign window
What to do now: freeze scope creep, compress decision paths, and put an executive decision cadence in place.
π Common Diagnostics
Aim your fix with these quick checks:
-
Decision ownership: Is there a single accountable approver per milestone?
-
Acceptance criteria: Are “done” standards written (format, specs, brand rules, examples)?
-
Feedback quality: Are comments actionable (objective criteria) or opinion loops?
-
Approval ladder: Is there an expedite path for time-sensitive decisions?
-
Asset readiness: Are reference assets/brand kits centralized and current?
-
Contract hygiene: Do SOWs state approval SLAs and “silence = proceed” for low-risk steps?
π Action Playbook
1) Make Decisions Flow (Risk Stage)
-
Name the approver per milestone (one accountable, many consulted)
-
Set approval SLAs (e.g., 48h concept/copy; 24h minor edits; 72h final legal)
-
Define acceptance criteria in the brief/SOW with examples & checklists
-
Create decision packets: single link with the file, context, success criteria, and due date
Expected impact: shorter decision cycles; fewer “back to the drawing board” moments.
2) Reduce Loops (Risk → Early Issue)
-
Batch feedback in standing review windows instead of trickle comments
-
Lock revision caps (e.g., 2 rounds) and convert extras to Change Requests (CRs)
-
Use structured feedback forms (must-keep / nice-to-have; objective reasons)
-
Shift work down: juniors execute; seniors provide direction + final QA
Expected impact: realization ↑ 5–10pp; on-time delivery ↑; senior burnout ↓.
3) Expedite When It’s Hot (Active Issue)
-
Executive decision cadence: 15-min daily stand-up until milestone unblocked
-
Fallback rule: “silence = proceed” on low-risk steps after SLA; for high-risk, escalate to sponsor
-
Scope freeze on the current milestone; new asks → CR with impact chart
-
Visible burn chart: show time lost vs remaining to sharpen choices
Expected impact: decisions land; scope creep contained; dates recovered.
4) Make It Stick (Post-Mortem)
-
Brief template upgrade: add acceptance criteria, asset checklist, approver names
-
SOW upgrades: approval SLAs, revision caps, CR triggers, expedite ladder
-
Governance rhythm: weekly milestone review; red/yellow items get sponsor attention
-
Library & systems: central brand kit, examples, and reusable components
Expected impact: predictable approvals, fewer loops, faster launches.
π Contract & Renewal Implications
-
Approval SLAs (by milestone type) and “silence = proceed” rules for low-risk steps
-
Revision caps with a fee schedule for extra rounds
-
CR path for scope additions or compressed timelines
-
Kill/cancellation fees and milestone acceptance language
-
Executive escalation clause for time-critical campaigns
π KPIs to Monitor
-
Median approval latency — target ≤ 48h (minor ≤ 24h; legal ≤ 72h)
-
Revisions per deliverable — target ≤ 2.0
-
On-time milestone rate — target ≥ 95%
-
Realization % — target ≥ 85–90%
-
Senior utilization — healthy 75–85%; avoid sustained > 90%
π§ Why This Playbook Matters
Great creative needs great decisions. When approvals are owned, timed, and standards-based, teams move with confidence, juniors get to contribute, seniors steer—not scramble—and launches hit their date without torching margin.
β Key Takeaways
-
One owner, clear clock: single approver + SLA per milestone.
-
Decide on standards: acceptance criteria end opinion loops.
-
Cap and convert: extra rounds become CRs.
-
Escalate fast: daily exec cadence for blocked launches.
-
Institutionalize: brief/SOW templates and a central brand kit keep flow.
β‘οΈ Run This Playbook on Your Data with DigitalCore